Thread: Non-Profit Poker Network? Check this out...

No, I'm not gonna read the fine print. It's not unusual for a poker network to limit your username across the network.

I'm judging the operation from a business model perspective, as I do with all investments.



there are least five operators that have committed to skins for the network’s startup, according to the creator of the concept and that was back in Feb.

So there are 5 backers, fives sites about to pop up on the Non-Profit Network?

Originally Posted by SycoSteve

Read the T&C. It's gonna be a one (1) account for the WHOLE NETWORK setup. Like Everleaf was supposed to be. . .

I got a good belly laugh out of this one:

3.1.19. The PLAYER shall periodically review these Terms and Conditions posted at FullFlushPoker website at a rate of not less than once every month.

SycoSteve I really don't see the terms of service being an issue
people still use Facebook and they changed the terms of service on privacy to state they can use ANYthing they want without your permission before they had to.

the share price of Facebook actually soared ahead 3% on that news

The fact that the poker site is telling you, you should be looking at the T&C where as most sites won't even bother mentioning there have been changes is unusual in the sense that it seems reputable.

If FullFlushPoker is the first website established by the network, then it stands to reason that it is currently the only one referenced by the network.

I'm not pushing the site or the network, I just happened onto some information and wanted to compare notes with anyone in the loop.

Originally Posted by Assistanc3

SycoSteve I really don't see the terms of service being an issue
people still use Facebook and they changed the terms of service on privacy to state they can use ANYthing they want without your permission before they had to.

the share price of Facebook actually soared ahead 3% on that news

The fact that the poker site is telling you, you should be looking at the T&C where as most sites won't even bother mentioning there have been changes is unusual in the sense that it seems reputable.

It could be altruism in the form of stating common sense, but it makes me wonder how often and how extensively they may be maing "updates" to the T&C. . .

Given how well the latest entrants that have comprised the latest "boom" in rooms -- Poker Rebel and Poker Dominicano -- seem to be fairing/faired why should this one do any better?

Bottom line for there's not a lot to attract me to this "network" right now and do not see how it is any more -- or less -- legal than Merge, Revolution, Winning or Bovada.
I have enough places to play without needing another. G'luck to those who jump in. . .

Originally Posted by grilldoggy

If FullFlushPoker is the first website established by the network, then it stands to reason that it is currently the only one referenced by the network.

FullFlushPoker is run by the same people that run the network
comparable to Carbon on Merge network


.... just thought I would toss that out there

Originally Posted by Assistanc3

FullFlushPoker is run by the same people that run the network
comparable to Carbon on Merge network


.... just thought I would toss that out there

Are you saying that FullFlushPoker is owned by the network rather than a subsidiary of it?